<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 17 Tips for Shooting with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotrodcameras.com/2009/06/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1</link>
	<description>We Build Photographic Hot Rods!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hey

Is there a particular reason that you guys chose to develop a mount for the GH1 over the canon?  Are there areas that you know of where the GH1 out performs the Canon or vice versa.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey</p>
<p>Is there a particular reason that you guys chose to develop a mount for the GH1 over the canon?  Are there areas that you know of where the GH1 out performs the Canon or vice versa.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hi Jake,

The Post Production Supervisor of REJOUER did a test.  He said it was close, but he gave the prize to CineForm.  I don&#039;t know the details of the work, but in the next 4-weeks or so I plan to get a lot more content up on the site including more BTS information from REJOUER.

I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jake,</p>
<p>The Post Production Supervisor of REJOUER did a test.  He said it was close, but he gave the prize to CineForm.  I don&#8217;t know the details of the work, but in the next 4-weeks or so I plan to get a lot more content up on the site including more BTS information from REJOUER.</p>
<p>I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hey there again

I was also wondering if anybody has done a comparison of cineform vs. Compressor when doing a reverse telecine on the GH1 24p footage.  Its not insanely expensive and would be worth it if it did something better.  Cineform talks about how it interpolates the color space.  I know compressor turns the 4:2:0 to 4:2:2 but I&#039;m curious as to which program might do it better.  Any thoughts?

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there again</p>
<p>I was also wondering if anybody has done a comparison of cineform vs. Compressor when doing a reverse telecine on the GH1 24p footage.  Its not insanely expensive and would be worth it if it did something better.  Cineform talks about how it interpolates the color space.  I know compressor turns the 4:2:0 to 4:2:2 but I&#8217;m curious as to which program might do it better.  Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Jake,

Thanks for the comment.  The workflow that doesn&#039;t require any non-Apple software I&#039;ve outlined on my website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hotrodcameras.com/2009/10/08/gh1compressor-workflow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.   Otherwise CineForm makes a piece of software called NeoHD which also works quite well.  I believe they have their GH1 workflow posted somewhere on their website www.cineform.com.

I definitely think that shooting FHD 1920x1080/23.98p is going to give you a better &#039;film look&#039; than 720/60p and transcoding to 23.98.  Once you have a 1920x1080/23.98 timeline (not a 29.97 timeline!) you can export your 24p master and then transcode to a SD NTSC finish (there are number of ways to accomplish this successfully).  Shoot and work in the maximum quality available to you, that will preserve your best &#039;film look&#039; when you reach SD.

BTW, awesome website and company name!!

I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jake,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  The workflow that doesn&#8217;t require any non-Apple software I&#8217;ve outlined on my website <a href="http://www.hotrodcameras.com/2009/10/08/gh1compressor-workflow/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.   Otherwise CineForm makes a piece of software called NeoHD which also works quite well.  I believe they have their GH1 workflow posted somewhere on their website <a href="http://www.cineform.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cineform.com</a>.</p>
<p>I definitely think that shooting FHD 1920&#215;1080/23.98p is going to give you a better &#8216;film look&#8217; than 720/60p and transcoding to 23.98.  Once you have a 1920&#215;1080/23.98 timeline (not a 29.97 timeline!) you can export your 24p master and then transcode to a SD NTSC finish (there are number of ways to accomplish this successfully).  Shoot and work in the maximum quality available to you, that will preserve your best &#8216;film look&#8217; when you reach SD.</p>
<p>BTW, awesome website and company name!!</p>
<p>I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeG_Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeG_Minneapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hey
Shooting a commercial next week with the GH1 and your PL mount and I cant wait.  If we decide to go with 1080 24p, whats the best workflow you&#039;ve worked out so far?  As of now the spot will get trasncoded to  ProRes 422HQ.  The final delivery will be a SD letterbox version for local/Midwest TV/cable.  Is the 24p going to give us the best &quot;film&quot; look or are we better off doing 60?  And regardless of the answer to that question I&#039;m still interested in what people have come up with for a 24p work flow for a 29.97 finish.

Thanks

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey<br />
Shooting a commercial next week with the GH1 and your PL mount and I cant wait.  If we decide to go with 1080 24p, whats the best workflow you&#8217;ve worked out so far?  As of now the spot will get trasncoded to  ProRes 422HQ.  The final delivery will be a SD letterbox version for local/Midwest TV/cable.  Is the 24p going to give us the best &#8220;film&#8221; look or are we better off doing 60?  And regardless of the answer to that question I&#8217;m still interested in what people have come up with for a 24p work flow for a 29.97 finish.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&gt; Thank you SO much for the tips and knowledge to jump start the rest of us.

My pleasure.  So glad you&#039;re enjoying the the Hot Rod system.  I can&#039;t wait to see the ambulance crash!

I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Thank you SO much for the tips and knowledge to jump start the rest of us.</p>
<p>My pleasure.  So glad you&#8217;re enjoying the the Hot Rod system.  I can&#8217;t wait to see the ambulance crash!</p>
<p>I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McLachlan ASC,CSC</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McLachlan ASC,CSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thank you SO much for the tips and knowledge to jump start the rest of us. I just bought a Deluxe rig for my new GH1 after testing it practically and having Technicolor Vancouver &quot;process it&quot; as well well as sending it to my long time timer in LA, Phil Azenzer, at Encore Hollywood.  At Technicolor Vancouver I viewed the material with master colorist Gary Shaw and we both cracked up when we saw it. It&#039;s SO good. Gary had timed 16mm and 35mm stuff I shot 20+ years ago and was amazed. The camera was sitting on the bench beside us.  Phil meanwhile looked hard at the colorimetry and declared it really good.  So.... on Sunday I mounted it in an unmanned ambulance going 40 mph. that we crashed into a concrete barrier and the footage is terrific.  It will appear in the new FOX series Human Target in January following American Idol... so stay tuned. I can&#039;t wait to get one of my nice Cooke S4i&#039;s on it.  The main cameras for the show are D21&#039;s which I&#039;m liking a lot.

Oh and FYI. I used the stock lens on the crash at 200 iso , wide open at 1080 at 30 for the failing light. The camera went all blurry a beat after the impact but recovered and is fine in spite of taking a REALLY hard shock.  I used a small mount the EFX guys made for me. I&#039;ll send photos soon if you like.

Thanks again.

Rob McLachlan ASC,CSC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SO much for the tips and knowledge to jump start the rest of us. I just bought a Deluxe rig for my new GH1 after testing it practically and having Technicolor Vancouver &#8220;process it&#8221; as well well as sending it to my long time timer in LA, Phil Azenzer, at Encore Hollywood.  At Technicolor Vancouver I viewed the material with master colorist Gary Shaw and we both cracked up when we saw it. It&#8217;s SO good. Gary had timed 16mm and 35mm stuff I shot 20+ years ago and was amazed. The camera was sitting on the bench beside us.  Phil meanwhile looked hard at the colorimetry and declared it really good.  So&#8230;. on Sunday I mounted it in an unmanned ambulance going 40 mph. that we crashed into a concrete barrier and the footage is terrific.  It will appear in the new FOX series Human Target in January following American Idol&#8230; so stay tuned. I can&#8217;t wait to get one of my nice Cooke S4i&#8217;s on it.  The main cameras for the show are D21&#8242;s which I&#8217;m liking a lot.</p>
<p>Oh and FYI. I used the stock lens on the crash at 200 iso , wide open at 1080 at 30 for the failing light. The camera went all blurry a beat after the impact but recovered and is fine in spite of taking a REALLY hard shock.  I used a small mount the EFX guys made for me. I&#8217;ll send photos soon if you like.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
<p>Rob McLachlan ASC,CSC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Dear Augusto,

I&#039;ve never seen the phenomenon you&#039;re describing.  If you can email me a sample I&#039;ll take a look, illyafriedman@gmail.com

I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Augusto,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen the phenomenon you&#8217;re describing.  If you can email me a sample I&#8217;ll take a look, <a href="mailto:illyafriedman@gmail.com">illyafriedman@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augusto Alves da Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Augusto Alves da Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with the GH1 and didn´t figure out what is due to... When I film moving objects i.e. cars I get like a stuttery image sideways like I had no fields in normal video... When I slo-mo those images the cars &quot;jump&quot; from one frame to the next giving the impression of jumpy stuttery video...Can you help me on this? Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with the GH1 and didn´t figure out what is due to&#8230; When I film moving objects i.e. cars I get like a stuttery image sideways like I had no fields in normal video&#8230; When I slo-mo those images the cars &#8220;jump&#8221; from one frame to the next giving the impression of jumpy stuttery video&#8230;Can you help me on this? Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hotrodcameras.com/panasonic/17-tips-for-shooting-with-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotrodcameras.com/?p=292#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Ah... I follow you now.  I actually leave all the settings in &quot;smooth&quot; at zero.  In fact, for most thing -1/+1 seems to be enough for any alteration to normal shooting.  In my testing I didn&#039;t like any of the -2 or +2 settings.  -1/+1 seemed like a small but noticeable adjustment -2/+2 just seemed to move things too much for my taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; I follow you now.  I actually leave all the settings in &#8220;smooth&#8221; at zero.  In fact, for most thing -1/+1 seems to be enough for any alteration to normal shooting.  In my testing I didn&#8217;t like any of the -2 or +2 settings.  -1/+1 seemed like a small but noticeable adjustment -2/+2 just seemed to move things too much for my taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

