17 simple rules to make a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 look the best it can.
The Pansonic Lumix GH1 is a remarkable achievement for an inexpensive still/HD camera system (or HDSLR.) However, the GH1 is not without its faults. Over the past several weeks Hot Rod Cameras has compiled some simple rules to help make images shot on the GH1 look as good as possible. Give this blog a quick read, and remember when in doubt “test, test, test” any unusual scenario. As you shoot more with the camera you’ll start to learn instinctively what you can and can’t get away with (just like any other camera system).
- Always shoot in “Creative Motion Picture Mode” (the little movie camera icon mode.) We could go on and on in regards to why, but trust us, it’s the only completely manual mode (use a manual lens to make everything manual)
- Turn on the histogram function, and if you don’t know how to read it, test it until you do. You can turn it off instantly by pressing (Display).
- Turn [I.EXPOSURE] (Intelligent exposure adjustment) to OFF, and be cautious if using it in low light situations. Even when turned off, some modes will automatically use the feature. The only one we’ve found that really keeps it “off” completely is “Creative Motion Picture Mode”.
- All ISO settings listed in the camera are faster than stated. Consider each to be the most conservative “estimates” of your actual ISO. If you plan to show your project on a truly BIG screen, only work at ISO settings of 500 or below.
- The AVCHD codec is highly compressed. Extra motion will not help your image quality, use a tripod, dolly, Steadicam™ or other rigid surface to prevent camera shake whenever possible.
- Working at extreme telephoto focal lengths will make camera shake worse, use a tripod and avoid wild/random pans and tilts.
- The camera like light, always have enough illumination for a proper base exposure.
- When working with saturated “warm” colors, underexpose about ½ a stop. The red color channel has more artifacts that either the blue or green, underexposing will help any red/orange and yellow objects on camera appear cleaner (or artifact free), it’s easy to bring up base exposure level up in post ½ stop should you need to.
- Use an IR/ND combination filtration rather than just ND whenever possible.
- If highlights are important, keep the brightest parts of the frame underexposed (no clipping), add fill light to your shadows.
- Light your shadows appropriately; you will not be able to pull up ‘black’ more than about ½ a stop (that’s not much!), the GH1’S AVCHD compression drops all the detail in “black.” So if you dig down too far, you’ll find nothing there but grey muck. You can preview this on the monitor live, or on an external monitor in playback.
- The “FHD” 1920×1080/24p mode does NOT use a standard 3:2 pulldown. Make sure you remove the pulldown using a method that preserves the real 24p frames and not the interpolated frames. The interpolated frames are of particularly low quality.
- Shooting with the GH1 is not like a RAW camera, bright highlights and dark, dark blacks are WYSIWYG. If you can’t get those levels to the correct point in-camera (on your monitor/histogram), you won’t be able to get them right in post. However, the GOOD news is that you get a decent amount of contrast with the image in some of the user selectable ‘film modes’ (including “Standard”) up to nearly 10-stops (about 2.5 over, and 7 down) if you can maintain your shadows to highlight contrast ratio- and keep skin tones more or less in the middle, you can keep a lot of detail/information, and then can confidently move those levels around in post.
- Shooting in (SHD) 720p60 give you a slightly cleaner red channel, than (FHD).
- Upconverting (SHD) from 720p to 1080p and adding a small amount of sharpening creates an image that will seamlessly intercut with GH1 material acquired at (FHD) 1920×1080.
- ATW (Auto Tracking White) WB (White Balance) mode may make color correction of flesh tones more difficult.
- If you have a scene with very high contrast you can lower contrast in the “My Film” mode. The “Smooth” film mode has the lowest starting contrast.
Following these steps does not guarantee that you will have no imaging problems, but it will certainly help you be aware of where things can go wrong. When treating the camera correctly it can produce sublime images that look like they come from cameras costing much, much more. Using proper lenses make getting the shot much easier.
As many people start playing with a GH1, they’ll eventually notice that a whip pan doesn’t look particularly good. However, a whip pan is a case of extreme motion and the camera recovers instantly as it slows down so it’s pretty easy to forgive such a minor fault. But that’s not what we do, we wanted to find a scenario that would really break the image, yet seem more or less “mundane.” Any camera can be brought to it’s knees in one respect or another, if you know how. If you would like to see the “worst case scenario” for the GH1 you should plan on doing the following STRESS TEST. Shoot a fast moving subject traveling quickly and repeatedly from screen left to screen right and vice-versa. If the subject is traveling fast enough particularly close to camera or at a focal length where the subject appears quite large in the frame (to smaller in the frame) it will further makes the picture quality deteriorate. Use the deepest focus (largest depth of field) possible. Watching this shot for an extended period of time, you begin to notice problems affecting motion, detail and color. You’ll then have an easier time spotting these problems in the future. After determining the weak spots of the camera we performed our own GH1 “torture test”.
The Hot Rod Cameras GH1 test: A fair skinned child wearing white/orange on a bright day, near trees with dark-black shadows. The child swings on a swing very SWIFTLY back and forth from a ‘medium shot’ to ‘medium close up’. The playground equipment and green trees in the background are near matches for primary colors (red, blue and green). This scenario pushes the dynamic range, compression codec and color space. We also added in a busy background (extra motion), moved the camera in swift pans/hand held and turned on ATW WB.
To clearly spot the problem areas we then viewed 1080/720p test images on an approximately 30’ Stewart 1.0 gain screen, projected by a Christie CP2000 2K projector, with color correction performed on a Quantel Pablo. 1080 pulldown removed, 720/60p converted to 24p.
What’s particularly interesting- those who only saw the test shots on the big screen for a few seconds; or on a large plasma monitor size screen didn’t notice any of these imaging problems. Those of us who watched closely and repeatedly could see them all.
In the next few weeks there’s going to be a lot more information posted about how to get the best possible images from such an inexpensive camera. Links to sample images, and details on productions using PL mount lenses on the GH1.
This is a fantastic way for micro/low-budget shows to get the best bang for the buck possible, and for bigger budget shows to add an extra/creative angle on a shot/scene for almost no additional cost to the production or manpower.
Some of the initial images I’ve seen from the GH1/Hot Rod PL are remarkably encouraging, I can’t wait to see the completed projects shooting right now.
Hi Illya,
Great post, some really useful points there.
I have a few questions about some of the points, if you have a moment, I’d love your thoughts.
1) I.EXPOSURE – You mention turning this off? In one of the DVXUser forums, some people have suggested that having this on might act as a ‘black stretch’ and help preserve shadow details. Does that make any sense, or does the I.EXPOSURE mode just add noise?
http://www.panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/gh1/ia.html#no07
2) Base ISO – Again, in the DVXUser forums, some people have suggested that the camera works best at ISO 400? Is there any weight to this in your experience? I think they mentioned something about how the sensor operates natively at ISO 320?
3) You mention adding IR filters, what is the reasoning for this? Does it help with the noise in the red channel?
4) What do you suggest for monitoring solutions? If you have the still settings manually set to the same as the movie settings could you take a snapshot and take the still into PS and examine it or something? From memory, the camera doesn’t provide output to HDMI or composite while shooting does it?
5) With the film modes, is it worth adjusting constrast/sat/noise reduction down? Particularly if you’re shooting with a color correction workflow in mind in post.
Sorry for all the questions, am looking forward to trying to squeeze the best possible image out of the camera as possible.
Cheers,
Ed.
Hi Ed,
Read what Panasonic writes about iExposure – “the camera automatically adjusts the aperture and shutter speed to keep the setting slightly under-exposed to prevent wash-out while brightening the darkened area by increasing the ISO only in that area.”
Fine for stills, but it’s the last thing you want is the camera taking over your shutter/aperture/ISO control unless it’s for a particular effect. I have been able to get some very nice “automatic iris-pull” type moves with controlled pans/tilts with iExposure. However, if you have an Assistant, the manual approach is better.
My experience the cleanest film-like images are coming from 100 ISO, underexposed by rating a light meter at 640 (500 also seems okay). Keeping highlights preserved with the aperture (iris) and fill lighting shadows to get them to where you want. I like Minolta light meters, Sekonics are also great. Even an older (cheapo) stills meter will work as long as you can select 1/50 second.
IR Filter- yes, helps Red channel- the weakest of the 3 by far. Some daylight/bulbs/flames/coals kick out more IR than others. It definitely helps reds/oranges/yellows.
Monitoring is the biggest problem with this camera. I really hope that Panasonic offers a live output, even a slightly delayed live output (3-4 frames) would be much better than as it is now (nothing). I’m working with people who are working around it, but it’s like shooting with film before the invention of the video tap. Every other similar HDSLR is offering this feature, the GH1 would sell a lot more units with a live output via HDMI.
As for the adjustments, you don’t get a lot of fine tuning movement, but they definitely make a difference. If one of these parameters is important for the scene you are shooting, I would recommend you make the changes. +2 NR is too soft for my taste and -2 NR is a bit too sharp, I like where they have NR right in the middle. +1/-1 NR would probably be the maximum I would move that selection.
No apology necessary Ed. I’m happy to help!
I.
Hot Rod Cameras
Illya,
I’ve been experimenting with a PAL GH1 and used many of your tips (many thanks). One thing I find is that the image recorded by the camera can be higher contrast than I thought it would be. In Creative Motion Picture mode and manual exposure (shutter locked at 1/50th) I have been using smooth style (settings set low), ISO 100 and 320 maximum, i.exposure off. Sometimes skin tones are also less attractive than I hoped. I have been using auto white balance. Can you give me some suggestions? Thanks.
Hi Spottidog- What do you mean by “setting set low”? I’m not sure I follow. I’ve found skin tones look weird using AWB, and I don’t use it anymore. I actually eluded to this in my Blog post “GH1 Film Look – New Tips”. Anyway, hit WB, scroll to the far right option which looks like a wrench and hit up to manually set Kelvin temperature. Skin tones became far more accurate with WB manually set. I’m fairly certain that the sensor is native daylight balanced, as each channel looks cleaner under daylight temperatures. The people I’m working with have now settled on 5500K as the “default”, and generally try to light scenes based on that Kelvin temperature for white. It doesn’t mean that other Kelvins temps settings aren’t also used… but they never, ever, turn on AWB.
When we did the DI for our 35mm film out test, our very expensive colorist had a hard time with the skin tones shot with the AWB setting. I’ve also noticed that the “white target” mode of manual WB is weird with the camera, I had the entire image turn green during testing- I’ve never had another camera do that. Dial in you WB manually, based on a daylight sensor (5500) and you shouldn’t have a problem.
Illya, thanks for the information. I tried the manual WB option (where you fill the frame with a white target) and like you found it unsatisfactory — which put me off manual balance. I will set 5500k for my next tests as you suggest.
What do you mean by “setting set low” — the four options you get with a film style I set all to -2. Like you I feel the Smooth film style seems to give the best look for me.
Thanks.
Ah… I follow you now. I actually leave all the settings in “smooth” at zero. In fact, for most thing -1/+1 seems to be enough for any alteration to normal shooting. In my testing I didn’t like any of the -2 or +2 settings. -1/+1 seemed like a small but noticeable adjustment -2/+2 just seemed to move things too much for my taste.
I have a problem with the GH1 and didn´t figure out what is due to… When I film moving objects i.e. cars I get like a stuttery image sideways like I had no fields in normal video… When I slo-mo those images the cars “jump” from one frame to the next giving the impression of jumpy stuttery video…Can you help me on this? Thank you
Dear Augusto,
I’ve never seen the phenomenon you’re describing. If you can email me a sample I’ll take a look, illyafriedman@gmail.com
I.
Thank you SO much for the tips and knowledge to jump start the rest of us. I just bought a Deluxe rig for my new GH1 after testing it practically and having Technicolor Vancouver “process it” as well well as sending it to my long time timer in LA, Phil Azenzer, at Encore Hollywood. At Technicolor Vancouver I viewed the material with master colorist Gary Shaw and we both cracked up when we saw it. It’s SO good. Gary had timed 16mm and 35mm stuff I shot 20+ years ago and was amazed. The camera was sitting on the bench beside us. Phil meanwhile looked hard at the colorimetry and declared it really good. So…. on Sunday I mounted it in an unmanned ambulance going 40 mph. that we crashed into a concrete barrier and the footage is terrific. It will appear in the new FOX series Human Target in January following American Idol… so stay tuned. I can’t wait to get one of my nice Cooke S4i’s on it. The main cameras for the show are D21’s which I’m liking a lot.
Oh and FYI. I used the stock lens on the crash at 200 iso , wide open at 1080 at 30 for the failing light. The camera went all blurry a beat after the impact but recovered and is fine in spite of taking a REALLY hard shock. I used a small mount the EFX guys made for me. I’ll send photos soon if you like.
Thanks again.
Rob McLachlan ASC,CSC
> Thank you SO much for the tips and knowledge to jump start the rest of us.
My pleasure. So glad you’re enjoying the the Hot Rod system. I can’t wait to see the ambulance crash!
I.
Hey
Shooting a commercial next week with the GH1 and your PL mount and I cant wait. If we decide to go with 1080 24p, whats the best workflow you’ve worked out so far? As of now the spot will get trasncoded to ProRes 422HQ. The final delivery will be a SD letterbox version for local/Midwest TV/cable. Is the 24p going to give us the best “film” look or are we better off doing 60? And regardless of the answer to that question I’m still interested in what people have come up with for a 24p work flow for a 29.97 finish.
Thanks
Jake
Hi Jake,
Thanks for the comment. The workflow that doesn’t require any non-Apple software I’ve outlined on my website here. Otherwise CineForm makes a piece of software called NeoHD which also works quite well. I believe they have their GH1 workflow posted somewhere on their website http://www.cineform.com.
I definitely think that shooting FHD 1920×1080/23.98p is going to give you a better ‘film look’ than 720/60p and transcoding to 23.98. Once you have a 1920×1080/23.98 timeline (not a 29.97 timeline!) you can export your 24p master and then transcode to a SD NTSC finish (there are number of ways to accomplish this successfully). Shoot and work in the maximum quality available to you, that will preserve your best ‘film look’ when you reach SD.
BTW, awesome website and company name!!
I.
Hey there again
I was also wondering if anybody has done a comparison of cineform vs. Compressor when doing a reverse telecine on the GH1 24p footage. Its not insanely expensive and would be worth it if it did something better. Cineform talks about how it interpolates the color space. I know compressor turns the 4:2:0 to 4:2:2 but I’m curious as to which program might do it better. Any thoughts?
Jake
Hi Jake,
The Post Production Supervisor of REJOUER did a test. He said it was close, but he gave the prize to CineForm. I don’t know the details of the work, but in the next 4-weeks or so I plan to get a lot more content up on the site including more BTS information from REJOUER.
I.
Hey
Is there a particular reason that you guys chose to develop a mount for the GH1 over the canon? Are there areas that you know of where the GH1 out performs the Canon or vice versa.
Jake